In a typical conversation today, it is not difficult to sense when someone has stopped listening. Their attention shifts, their response arrives too quickly, or their eyes drift toward a screen waiting nearby. The exchange continues, but something essential has already been lost. We speak more than ever across platforms, devices, and digital spaces. But are we actually listening to one another?
Public debate today tends to focus on speech. Questions of who can speak, what should be regulated, and whether free expression is under threat dominate discussions about digital life. These are undeniably important concerns, but they rest on an assumption that we rarely examine: that being heard is a natural consequence of speaking.
The ancient Athenians understood that democratic speech required two things in equal measure: the right to speak, and the courage to speak truthfully. But both ideals depend on the presence of something the Athenians rarely discussed explicitly, because in the agora it was simply assumed: an audience willing to genuinely receive what was said. Speech and listening are not rival concerns. They are two sides of the same civic practice, and you cannot defend one without attending to the other.
Today, we have invested enormous energy in protecting and expanding the right to speak. We have paid far less attention to what happens on the receiving end.
Read more:
What ancient Athens teaches us about debate – and dissent – in the social media age
What listening actually requires
Listening is not a passive activity. It is not simply the absence of speaking, nor is it equivalent to hearing words as they pass by. To listen well is to engage with another person’s claim as something meaningful, something that can be understood, interpreted, and responded to on its own terms.
Philosophers call this uptake: the willingness to accurately receive what someone has said before reacting to it. In practice, this means sitting with an argument long enough to genuinely understand it, rather than responding to a simplified or distorted version of it. It means distinguishing what a person actually claimed from what we assumed they meant. It means treating the person speaking as a participant in a shared exchange, not as an obstacle to be overcome.
This is harder than it sounds. We tend to listen in order to respond rather than to understand. We scan for the moment we can push back, for the weakness in the argument, for the opening to make our own point. This is not listening. It is waiting.
The distinction matters enormously in democratic life. When citizens engage with caricatures of opposing views rather than the views themselves, public debate loses its capacity to produce anything other than noise. Disagreement becomes performance. Argument becomes theatre. And the possibility of genuine persuasion, of actually changing one’s mind in light of what another person has said, quietly disappears.
Digital environments make listening harder
The platforms that now host most of our public conversation were not designed with listening in mind. They were designed for engagement, which is a very different thing.
Engagement, as the major social media platforms measure it, means clicks, shares, reactions and time spent. Content that triggers strong emotions – particularly outrage, indignation and moral alarm – tends to perform well by these metrics. Content that invites careful reflection tends not to.
The result is an information environment that systematically rewards the kind of communication least conducive to genuine listening: fast, declarative, emotionally charged, and designed to provoke a reaction rather than prompt a response.
This is compounded by the way algorithms deliver content to us. We rarely encounter arguments in their full form, made by the people who hold them, in the context in which they were offered. Instead, we typically encounter fragments, screenshots, summaries and paraphrases, often selected precisely because they are easy to dismiss or ridicule. We are, in other words, being trained to engage with caricatures. And caricatures do not require listening. They only require a reaction.
The consequences for democratic life are serious. A public sphere in which people speak constantly but rarely feel genuinely heard is not a healthy one. It is one in which frustration accumulates, positions harden, and the common ground needed for collective decision-making becomes increasingly difficult to find. This is not simply a technology problem. It is a civic one. And it calls for a civic response.
How to teach (and practice) listening
The good news is that listening, unlike algorithmic design, is something we can directly influence. It is a skill, and skills can be taught.
In educational settings, this means creating spaces where students practice uptake deliberately. Teachers can, for instance, hold debates where students are required to restate a peer’s argument to their satisfaction before offering a critique. This practice creates an environment where equitable participation is a structural expectation rather than an afterthought, and where disagreement is treated as an opportunity to understand rather than to win.
The same discipline applies beyond live discussion. Students can be asked to listen to a podcast, watch a video, or read an article with one task in mind: can you explain its argument fairly before deciding whether you agree with it?
These are not merely classroom exercises. They are rehearsals for democratic life.
These habits can be cultivated outside formal education too. Before responding to something that provokes you, pause long enough to ask whether you have understood the actual argument. Before critiquing a position, restate it in terms its holder would recognise. Separate what a person said from your assumptions about why they said it. These are small adjustments, but practised consistently, they change the quality of exchange.
A democracy that only teaches people to speak freely has only done half the work. In ancient Greece, the agora was not a stage. It was a place of exchange. Restoring that spirit, in classrooms, in conversations, and in the digital spaces we now inhabit together, begins with the quieter and more demanding skill of learning to truly listen.
A weekly e-mail in English featuring expertise from scholars and researchers. It provides an introduction to the diversity of research coming out of the continent and considers some of the key issues facing European countries. Get the newsletter!
