Assessment of pediatric surgical needs, health-seeking behaviors, and health systems in a rural district of Pakistan

Health


Abstract

Surgical conditions are responsible for up to 15% of total Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) lost globally. Approximately 4.8 billion people have no access to surgical care and this studies aim is to assess the surgical disease burden in children under the age of five years. We used Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) and Pediatric Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, and Supplies (PediPIPES) survey tools in Tando Mohammad Khan (TMK). A set of photographs of lesions were also taken for review by experts. All the data was recorded electronically via an android application. The current surgical need was defined as the caregiver’s reported surgical problems in their children and the unmet surgical need was defined as a surgical problem for which the respondent did not access care. Descriptive analysis was performed. Information of 6,371 children was collected. The study identified 1,794 children with 3,072 surgical lesions. Categorization of the lesions by the six body regions suggested that head and neck accounted for the greatest number of lesions (55.2%) and the most significant unmet surgical need (16.6%). The chest region had the least unmet surgical need of 5.9%. A large percentage of the lesions were managed at a health care facility, but the treatment essentially consisted of mainly medical management (87%), and surgical treatment was provided for only 11% of lesions. The health facility assessment suggested that trained personnel including surgeons, anesthetic, or trained nurses were only available at one hospital. Basic procedures such as suturing and wound debridement were only performed frequently. This study suggests a high rate of unmet surgical need and a paucity of trained health staff and resources in this rural setting of Pakistan. The government needs to make policies and ensure funding so that proper trained staff and supplies can be ensured at district level.

Introduction

Surgical conditions are responsible for up to 15% of total disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost globally [1]. Worldwide estimates have found that approximately 4.8 billion people have no access to surgical care, and within South Asia, greater than 95% of the population do not have access to care for conditions that require surgical management [2]. Considering that greater than 50% of the population in the least developed regions worldwide is children, we can surmise that the surgical burden amongst children in Low and Low Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is immense [3, 4]. Currently, a large disproportion exists between the wealthiest and poorest third of the population globally, with the wealthy receiving a major share of 73.6% of surgical procedures and the poor receiving only 3.5% [5]. Within poorer countries, surgical services are concentrated almost wholly in cities and reserved largely for those who can pay for them out of pocket [1].

Until recently, pediatric surgical care in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) was largely overlooked, with global health attention primarily addressing communicable diseases, and maternal and infant mortality [5]. However, improvement of surgical care delivery for children is now being prioritized as a fundamental component of health care in LMICs [6]. Improving surgical care delivery also has significant economic and welfare benefits for the population, as untreated surgical conditions increase medical costs, disability, and death [4]. Hence, the development of methods to enhance the quality of pediatric surgical care in low-resource regions can remarkably decrease childhood morbidity and mortality [7] and alleviate the associated financial and emotional stress.

To promote the development of LMICs healthcare delivery systems that includes pediatric surgical care, it is vital to understand the local burden of surgical disease in children, the local population’s understanding of these disease pathologies, and the capacity of healthcare facilities to handle the burden of disease. It is crucial to understand the pediatric surgical health-related behaviors of the community, as children often cannot express accurately their health issues, and their health-related decisions are mostly handled by parents and caregivers. Therefore community-level surveys provide a thorough measure of real-time surgical need [4]. The Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey has been the most frequently used population-based survey to estimate the surgical disease burden. It was primarily developed to measure surgical disease burden in LMICs [8]. From the time of its creation and first use, SOSAS has become a validated tool to assess a vast range of surgically treatable conditions at the population level [810]. It has previously been used in countries like Uganda, Rwanda, Nepal, and Sierra Leone [815]. The Pediatric Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedure, Equipment, and Supplies (PediPIPES) survey tool is designed to assess the pediatric surgical capacity of health facilities. This survey originated as the World Health Organization (WHO) tool for situational analysis but was subsequently redesigned by Surgeons OverSeas (SOS) to include absolute numbers of hospital beds and operating rooms, a binary system of measurement to allow easier counting of items, removing reasons for not performing procedures, and restructuring of individual questions [16].

Pakistan, a South Asian country with a population of approximately 221 million people is an LMIC with a Gross National Income (GNI) per capita of $1270 [17]. Approximately 63% of the population lives in rural areas [18]. Several studies have been published describing childhood surgical emergencies in Pakistan. However, through a literature review, it was identified that no community-based survey tool has yet been employed to determine Pakistan’s pediatric surgical disease burden in rural areas [1921].

The primary aim of this study is to conduct a population-based study to assess the burden of surgical disease for children under the age of five years, the population’s health-seeking behavior, and assess the health facilities in the rural district of Tando Mohammad Khan (TMK) in Sindh, Pakistan. It will contribute to our comprehension of the epidemiology of surgical diseases in rural Sindh and to an extent in Pakistan overall. It can help bring policymakers attention to the importance of improving access to surgical care facilities.

Methodology

The SOSAS and PediPIPES were conducted in a representative population of children under the age of five years over a period of three months, between 22nd November 2019 and 28th February 2020.

Study setting

Sindh is the second largest province by population (approximately six million people) and the third largest province in Pakistan [22]. TMK is one of the 29 districts in Sindh with an area of 1,814 square kilometers (km2), an overall population of 677,228, and a population density of 373 people/km2, Sindhi as the most commonly spoken language [23]. TMK district was chosen as the site for our project due to our established office in the district, the availability of skilled manpower and other resources to conduct this large-scale survey. TMK is also a representative of any rural district in Sindh.

Survey tools

The SOSAS survey consists of two portions. The first section collects demographic details, including the age and sex of household members, and number of deaths in the household within the past year. Household members are defined as people living in the same physical structure. The second half of the survey gathers information from caregivers on both current and previous surgical conditions of their children, which is categorized into six distinct anatomical regions: face, head, and neck; chest and breast; abdomen; groin, genitals, and buttocks; back; arms, hands, legs, and feet. The caregivers answered questions based on their recall and their perception of a surgical condition. Additional questions cover the type of injury/accident, timing of the condition, and health-seeking behavior, which includes the type of health care sought, type of health care received, and reasons if care was not accessed. The survey questions were translated into Sindhi, the primary language of TMK by coordination of experts in both English and Sindhi language and was pilot tested in the field.

The PediPIPES survey assesses gaps in the availability of essential and emergency surgical care (EESC) at the district health facilities. The data items were divided into five sections: Personnel; Infrastructure; Procedures; Equipment; and Supplies. PediPIPES scores were calculated by allocating 1 point for each personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment, and supplies present in the facility and summing it. This number was then divided by the total number of data items (118) and multiplied by 10 to create the PediPIPES index. There is no maximum number for the PediPIPES index. This index indicates the capacity of health facilities to provide EESC to infants and children.

Data collection

Households in TMK districts were line-listed and a total of 3,643 eligible houses were randomized. The SOSAS survey was conducted by research personnel who were trained for data collection and were monitored by senior managers. A pilot study for trial and improvements was conducted in 50 households. Verbal consent was obtained from the caregivers, and surveys were administered in Sindhi language. Caregivers provided the survey information about their children below the age of five years. The information was recorded electronically via an application developed specially for this survey by the District Monitoring Unity (DMU). The application was developed for Android, and an IIS-10 webserver was setup with MySQL database to collect data in the remote areas. APIs were developed on webserver in PHP to send and receive data to and from devices. The purpose of the android-based survey application was to assist data collectors in conducting interviews in the remote field areas and capture data in electronic format. The application was used on Samsung tab A7 tablet. To restrict inappropriate access to the application, authorized data collectors were required to authenticate using login credentials that were specifically generated for the use of this application on the server.

The PIPES survey data from all facilities in TMK was collected. The data was collected on hard copies and then entered onto an excel sheet. A total of 233 photographs were also taken of children with lesions to understand how these could help diagnosis and future roll-out of such a strategy. These were reviewed by the relevant surgeons at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) for diagnosis, and confirmation of the previously established diagnosis. These pictures were taken via the same application developed and stored on the tablet/phone under password protection.

Results

A total of 3,643 households were surveyed for children’s surgical needs in TMK. Of these households, 3,821 care givers filled the Surgeons Overseas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey form. Survey identified a sum of 6,071 children, with majority in the age range 1–5 years (81.4%). A near equal male (50.5%) to female ratio (49.5%) was present.

Burden

Lesions.

Of the 6,071 children included in the survey, a total of 1,794 (29.6%) children were identified to have or previously have had a total number of 3,072 lesions requiring surgical care, as some children were identified to have more than one type of lesion. Lesions were approximately equally distributed among males (52.6%) and females (47.4%). Most of the children affected were in the age range of 1–5 years (90.6%). An overview of the lesions is presented in Table 2. Through a head-to-toe inquiry via the SOSAS survey form, the head and neck region (Comprising of the head, eye, ear, and neck) was found to be most frequently affected (n = 1,697, 55.2%) followed by extremities (n = 524, 17.1%). By far, the most common lesions identified were non-injury-related wounds (37.6%) followed by mass/growth (13.6%). In majority of the cases (82.5%), lesions were not secondary to an accident. Amongst the remaining of 17.5% who suffered an accident; falls were the most common cause of injury (49.1%), followed by hot object/ hot liquid- related burn injury (23.4%).

Buttocks/Groin/Genitalia.

In a total of 169 lesions identified, majority were not associated with injury (27.2%), followed by solid mass or growth (21.3%) (Table 4). Of the 19 lesions secondary to an accident or injury, hot object burns accounted for the most lesions (42.1%), followed by falls (21.1%), animal attacks (15.8%), and open fire explosions (15.8%). The unmet surgical need for the region was 14.8%.

Health facility assessment

A total of 39 health facilities were identified and surveyed in the TMK district.

Equipment and supplies.

More than half of the hospitals had basic equipment and supplies as detailed in Tables 9 and 10. However, of note, apnea monitors, laparoscopic surgery supplies, chest tubes, neonatal T-piece and endoscopes were not available at any of the facilities. The availability of anesthesia machines, electrocautery machine, scalpel blades, syringe pumps, and sterile drapes was also significantly low (under 10% of facilities) (Tables 9 and 10).

Discussion

This assessment of surgical burden in children under five years, unmet surgical needs, healthcare seeking behavior, and the health facility assessment in a rural district of Pakistan, is the first of its nature where a systematic tool is used to assess the surgical burden.

This study highlights the significant surgical burden and unmet need in a rural setting of Pakistan. The head and neck accounted for the greatest number of lesions (55.2%) and the most significant unmet surgical need (16.6%), followed by the buttocks/groin and genitalia and the chest region had the least unmet surgical need. A large number of lesions were managed at a health care facility, mostly private health facilities. The treatment mainly consisted of medical management and surgical treatment was only given for 11% of the lesions. Compared to other LMICs in South Asia such as India (unmet surgical need of 6.5%) and Nepal (unmet surgical need of 5%) [9, 10, 13, 15, 24], the rates of current and unmet surgical need in TMK are high (14.3%), and Pakistan currently faces a challenge of inadequate surgical care delivery to children [25]. According to the World Bank 2019 data, India a neighboring country, reported a lower number of physicians per 1000 individuals compared to Pakistan (0.7 vs. 1.1) [26]. However, despite this the SOSAS study conducted in 2019 by Cherukupalli et al. [5] reported an unmet surgical need of 6.5% in rural India, which is much lower than the 14.3% in TMK. Although this is a limited comparison since both studies were conducted in specific regions of India and Pakistan which may have been affected by multiple geographic and cultural factors, it suggests a need for larger surveys and subsequent intervention in Pakistan.

Amongst children who had died due to a surgical cause and children who currently face a surgical problem, a large proportion did visit a health facility but were not managed appropriately, highlighting gaps in the quality of health service delivery in the health facilities. The parallel PediPIPES survey helped us explore the health facilities in the region which identified that not only did the facilities have a shortage of equipment, they also lacked the presence of trained surgical and especially pediatric surgery staff. Appropriate government policies at both provincial and federal level are required for the hiring and training of pediatric surgical staff and budget allocation to upgrade the standard of the health facilities. Along with the upgradation of health facilities, community outreach, there is need for awareness campaigns on emergent and disability inducing surgical diseases so that prompt care is sought. This need is highlighted by the fact that a large proportion of patients who were not taken to a health facility were due to lack of awareness of the acute nature of the condition or the inability to recognize the need for surgical management.

Access to surgical care could be addressed with the continuing development of surgical capacity at lower-level facilities, improving referral systems, and surgical training of non-physicians. Countries such as Malawi, and Mozambique have invested in training of non-physicians in surgery, however only a small fraction of the need can be dealt with in this fashion [27]. In addition to health facility capacity development, community-based educational programs for strengthening pre-hospital systems are vital [5]. Although the trauma burden in children under five is low in TMK, an initiative to provide basic first responder courses [28] together with early identification and management of surgical cases could help lay-people to contribute to better care and can act as a step to improve pre-hospital infrastructure, and increasing awareness in community [28]. Health service delivery may be greatly improved through a simple reorganization of services without any cost. For example, this can be demonstrated by the essential trauma-care guidelines and their use as needs assessment tools in multiple countries [29]. Increasing the availability of medications, equipment, supplies, and banked blood at the primary and secondary health care centers are essential steps as well [4, 30]. This allows adequate care for basic surgical problems at lower-level hospitals, whilst also providing an opportunity to stabilize more critically ill patients prior to being transported to a tertiary care center for more complex procedures.

The study has some potential limitations that included the study site may not represent the overall national picture of surgical burden but offers significant representation of any rural setting of Sindh. One significant limitation is in-built in the survey’s definition of operative conditions, as all operative conditions in this survey relied upon participants’ reported conditions in the verbal interview. Thus, the numbers identified through this survey serve as proxies in estimating operative disease prevalence. This may overestimate some conditions, which may require follow up rather than surgical intervention. The survey also does not determine diseases such as cancers, which could require surgical care, thus underestimating the true surgical burden of disease. Despite these limitations, surgical conditions recognized by SOSAS provide an initial estimate of the need for surgical consultations.

After this initial assessment in a rural district of Pakistan, the next step should be to perform a larger countrywide survey in Pakistan with an aim to compare the burden of surgical conditions in urban and rural regions. We also need to explore the differences in community’s approach to health seeking and the treatment options available. The successful trial implementation of photographs taken on-site and using them to reevaluate the established diagnosis with the help of physicians at a tertiary care setup, from different surgical sub-specialties. Follow ups can be established to link the patients with surgical conditions to trained nurses and surgeons in urban centers for surgical assistance. While we know it will take time in upgradation the current rural health care setup, this may help the more acutely suffering patients. A larger more generalizable survey for assessment of health facility standards and the surgical burden is needed in the other provinces, for a better understanding and comparable results which will inform and assist policy makers for drafting a targeted and priority based solution to the problem that exists.

References

  1. 1.
    Farmer PE, Kim JYJWjos. Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR. 2008;32 [4]:533–6.
  2. 2.
    Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, Weiser TG, Bickler SW, Rose JA, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. 2015;3 [6]:e316–e23.
  3. 3.
    Greenberg SL, Ng-Kamstra JS, Ameh EA, Ozgediz DE, Poenaru D, Bickler SW, editors. An investment in knowledge: research in global pediatric surgery for the 21st century. Seminars in pediatric surgery; 2016: Elsevier.
  4. 4.
    Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.
  5. 5.
    Cherukupalli SE, Bhatia MB, Boeck MA, Blair KJ, Nagarajan N, Gupta S, et al. SOSAS study in rural India: using accredited social health activists as enumerators. 2019;85(1):35.
  6. 6.
    WHA68 RJS-eWHA, Geneva. Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage. 2015;26.
  7. 7.
    Peltzer KJIP. Injury and social determinants among in-school adolescents in six African countries. 2008;14[6]:381–8.
  8. 8.
    Groen RS, Samai M, Petroze RT, Kamara TB, Yambasu SE, Calland JF, et al. Pilot testing of a population-based surgical survey tool in Sierra Leone. 2012;36[4]:771–4.
  9. 9.
    Groen RS, Samai M, Stewart K-A, Cassidy LD, Kamara TB, Yambasu SE, et al. Untreated surgical conditions in Sierra Leone: a cluster randomised, cross-sectional, countrywide survey. 2012;380(9847):1082–7. pmid:22898076
  10. 10.
    Petroze RT, Groen RS, Niyonkuru F, Mallory M, Ntaganda E, Joharifard S, et al. Estimating operative disease prevalence in a low-income country: results of a nationwide population survey in Rwanda. 2013;153[4]:457–64.
  11. 11.
    Butler EK, Tran TM, Fuller AT, Brammell A, Vissoci JR, de Andrade L, et al. Quantifying the pediatric surgical need in Uganda: results of a nationwide cross-sectional, household survey. 2016;32(11):1075–85. pmid:27614904
  12. 12.
    Fuller AT, Butler EK, Tran TM, Makumbi F, Luboga S, Muhumza C, et al. Surgeons overseas assessment of surgical need (SOSAS) Uganda: Update for Household Survey. 2015;39(12):2900–7. pmid:26316109
  13. 13.
    Gupta S, Ranjit A, Shrestha R, Wong EG, Robinson WC, Shrestha S, et al. Surgical needs of Nepal: pilot study of population based survey in Pokhara, Nepal. 2014;38(12):3041–6. pmid:25189447
  14. 14.
    Mock CN, Abantanga F, Cummings P, Koepsell TDJBotWHO. Incidence and outcome of injury in Ghana: a community-based survey. 1999;77(12):955.
  15. 15.
    Gupta S, Shrestha S, Ranjit A, Nagarajan N, Groen R, Kushner A, et al. Conditions, preventable deaths, procedures and validation of a countrywide survey of surgical care in Nepal. 2015;102[6]:700–7. pmid:25809125
  16. 16.
    Cairo SB, Kalisya LM, Bigabwa R, Rothstein DHJPSI. Characterizing pediatric surgical capacity in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: results of a pilot study. 2018;34(3):343–51. pmid:29159423
  17. 17.
    Bank TW. Pakistan 2020. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/Pakistan.
  18. 18.
    Bank TW. Rural Population (% of total population) 2020. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=PK.
  19. 19.
    Ahmed M, Ali Shah M, Luby S, Drago‐Johnson P, Wali SJTM, Health I. Survey of surgical emergencies in a rural population in the Northern Areas of Pakistan. 1999;4(12):846–57.
  20. 20.
    Blanchard RJ, Blanchard ME, Toussignant P, Ahmed M, Smythe CM. The epidemiology and spectrum of surgical care in district hospitals of Pakistan. 1987;77(11):1439–45. pmid:3661798
  21. 21.
    Talati JJ, Syed NAJWjos. Surgical training programs in Pakistan. 2008;32(10):2156–61. pmid:18566859
  22. 22.
    Bureau of Statistics Sindh PDB, Government of Sindh. Sindh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2018–19: Survey Findings Report 2020. Available from: http://sindhbos.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Sindh-MICS-2018-19-Final-SFR.pdf.
  23. 23.
    Comission SHR. Districts of Sindh. Available from: http://www.shrc.org.pk/info-districts.php.
  24. 24.
    Boeck MA, Nagarajan N, Gupta S, Varadaraj V, Groen RS, Shrestha S, et al. Assessing access to surgical care in Nepal via a cross-sectional, countrywide survey. 2016;160(2):501–8.
  25. 25.
    Siddiqui S, Vervoort D, Peters AW, Shoman H, Ashraf NM, Fatima I, et al. Closing the gap of children’s surgery in Pakistan. 2019;2[1]:e000027.
  26. 26.
    Bank TW. Physicians (per 1000 people) 2019. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS?locations=PK.
  27. 27.
    Chilopora G, Pereira C, Kamwendo F, Chimbiri A, Malunga E, Bergström SJHrfh. Postoperative outcome of caesarean sections and other major emergency obstetric surgery by clinical officers and medical officers in Malawi. 2007;5:17.
  28. 28.
    Callese TE, Richards CT, Shaw P, Schuetz SJ, Issa N, Paladino L, et al. Layperson trauma training in low-and middle-income countries: a review. 2014;190[1]:104–10. pmid:24746252
  29. 29.
    Mock C, Lormand J, Goosen J, Joshipura M, Peden MJGWHOGS. Guidelines for essential trauma care (2004).
  30. 30.
    Raykar NP, Yorlets RR, Liu C, Greenberg SL, Kotagal M, Goldman R, et al. A qualitative study exploring contextual challenges to surgical care provision in 21 LMICs. 2015;385:S15. pmid:26313061



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *